Kayleigh McEnany Says Circuit Court Judge ‘Misunderstood The Argument’
After Third Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Stephanos Bibas issued a scathing ruling against the Trump Campaign’s effort to have the certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election overturned, FoxNews reported that one of the president’s lawyers, Jenna Ellis tweeted “The activist judicial machinery in Pennsylvania continues to cover up the allegations of massive fraud.”
Later, in that same FoxNews segment, Kayleigh McEnany spoke of Rep. Mike Kelly’s case “alleging that the whole mail-in system was unconstitutional – and he was deemed likely to succeed on the merits.” Hours later the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled against Kelly, with prejudice.
McEnany then explained that “this Third Circuit judge misunderstood the arugment – because it’s an equal protection argument, the one we’ve been making in court, and it says this, ‘if you were in the seven Blue counties in Pennsylvania you were given an extraordinary opportunity to fix your mail-in ballot – to cure your ballot. But if you were in the other sixty mainly Republican counties, you didn’t get that privilege. That’s an equal protection violation.”
One does have to wonder who would have appointed this activist judge who clearly lacked the intellectual capabilities of being able to grasp the legal theories that were presented by Rudolph Giuliani and Jenna Ellis
